CONNECT WITH US:

2015-2019 by Law Office of Glicel Sumagaysay.  All rights reserved.

 

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.  The contents of this site do not constitute a guarantee of any particular result.  

  • facebook-square
  • linkedin-square

CASES FILED

Ho, et al. v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District (“BART”), Alexander v. BART, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. C 15 - 01128 HSG.  Train Controller Trainee- Plaintiffs alleged claims of Failure to Pay Overtime and Failure to Pay Minimum Wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and Unjust Enrichment.

Mendoza v. Satellite Healthcare, et al., San Joaquin County Superior Court Case No. STK-CV-UWT-2017-7047.  Registered Nurse Plaintiff alleged claims of Failure to Provide Meal Periods or Compensation Therefor; Failure to Provide Rest Periods or Compensation Therefor; Failure to Pay Vested Vacation at Termination; Failure to Pay Earned Wages at Termination; Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Statements; Improper Deductions; Conversion; Unlawful Discrimination on the basis of Gender and Race or National Origin; Retaliation/Violation of Labor Code Section 1102.5; Wrongful Termination as Against Public Policy; Unlawful and/or Unfair Business Practices.

 

Ayala v. Frito-Lay, et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case No. C 15 - 01128 HSG.  Dispatcher-Plaintiff alleged claims for Unlawful Sex Discrimination; Unlawful Race Discrimination; Unlawful Disability Discrimination; Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation; Refusal to Engage in the Interactive Process; Unlawful Retaliation under the Fair Employment and Housing Act; Retaliation/Violations of Labor Code Sections 98.6, 98.7, and 1102.5; Retaliation for Reports of Safety Regulations/Violation of Labor Code Section 6310.; Wrongful Termination as Against Public Policy.

 

Wilkinson v. HomeStreet Bank, San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-18-566640; U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Case No. 3:18-cv-03629-JD.  Loan Officer Assistant Plaintiff alleged claims for Unlawful Discrimination based on Age; Unlawful Discrimination based on Sexual Orientation; Retaliation—Violation of Labor Code section 1102.5; and Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy.